Jonah 3: The God of Jonah and the God of Nineveh


This piece first appeared in Rabbi Natasha's commentary on the 929 Tanakh project here.


The sudden switch of Nineveh’s spiritual state would be fanciful in many narratives, but works in the weird and wonderful world of Jonah. Jonah, recently spewed upon the land by the giant fish in which he has been living, utters a proclamation (3:4: ‘Forty days more, and Nineveh shall be overturned!’). It is four words long, does not mention God or divine prophecy, and is perhaps only uttered once. And yet the city immediately turns on its heel and repents, saving it (for the time-being) from its fate.


Nineveh is a polytheistic city, and Jonah failed to mention that his proclamation was a prophecy from a universal God, but this doesn’t seem to be a problem. Unprompted, the Ninevites refer to God in a monotheistic manner. They use the name ‘E-lohim’. Though ‘E-lohim’ might look plural in number, it is used solely with singular verbs, indicating that it is God (and not a number of gods) to whom the Ninevites appeal. However, interestingly, this is not the way that God is referred to throughout the rest of the book. The narrative voice and Jonah both refer to God using the Name (spelled yud-hey vav-hey, pronounced A-donai). The sailors on the boat also use the Name, but only after they are fed this name from Jonah when he divulges his religious and ethnic background. 


We first see God referred to directly and solely as ‘E-lohim’ in 3:5, in which the Ninevites respond to Jonah’s proclamation by ‘believing E-lohim’. (There is perhaps another reference in 3:3, though the meaning of this Hebrew phrase is uncertain.) The Ninevites continue to refer to God this way. Then, in 3:10, we close the chapter with God’s response to the Ninevites. And in this verse, God is referred to solely as E-lohim. 


3:10: God [E-lohim] saw what they did, how they were turning back from their evil ways. And God [E-lohim] renounced the punishment He had planned to bring upon them, and did not carry it out. 

When the text turns back to the debrief between God and Jonah in Chapter 4, God will once again be referred to using the Name (A-donai).


Why do the Ninevites use the name E-lohim, when they were given no theistic language from Jonah? Why does God respond to them as E-lohim, instead of the name used throughout the rest of the book? Perhaps we are given a glimpse into a theological framework here. Behind all of our names for God, and all of our concepts of divinity, there is a basic and universal relationship between humanity and the Divine. The Ninevites, apparently ripe for repentance and perched on the edge of destruction, feel it in their souls when they are finally nudged to the side of the light. And thus God responds, not as a national god with a particular name, but as the life force behind the whole universe. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Book of Haggai

Image
Background of Haggai Time: 520BCE (Persian Period) Place: Yehud Kings:  None. Ruled by High Priest + Governor   Political Backdrop: ·        We’re back from exile! Step 1: Assyrians are the Big Bad: Northern Kingdom falls (722BCE) Step 2: Babylonians take over as the Big Bad: Southern Kingdom goes into exile (586BCE)             Exile period… 539BCE: Neo-Babylonian Empire falls to Cyrus the Great (Perisan Empire) Step 3: The Persian Empire sends us home! (538BCE) Primary Themes of Haggai: ·        The necessity to rebuild the Temple! ·        ‘On that day’ no longer refers to returning from exile   ·        Haggai speaks to the leadership – more like the historical prophets than the literary prophets! Structure of Haggai ...
Read more

The View From the Ziggurat - Parashat T'rumah

Image
The View From the Ziggurat           Imagine that we’re in a Temple.            Sorry, that wasn’t clear. We’re not in that Temple. Take your mind away from Jerusalem and picture, instead, a temple in ancient Mesopotamia. In this part of the world, a temple might be found perched atop a ziggurat - or, in Akkadian, ziqquratum , meaning “to build high”. You can guess from the name that it’s a high place. To get into the temple structure, we need to ascend an incredible staircase. The temple is made of layers and sections, and there are places we mere peasants cannot go. While not all ancient holy spaces were completely identical in all time periods, common features would appear in temple design among Israel's neighbours: courtyards outside, likely for the public; basins of water; altars for animal sacrifice; a structure of multiple layers, and - most importantly of all - a holy chamber that housed the god. You and I cannot e...
Read more

Miriam, Moses, and the Mumpsimus

Image
  Mosaic from the Abbey Church of the Dormition in Jerusalem           There is a story about a mistake made in Latin, in a Catholic mass, in the 16th Century. The story is of a priest who, when reciting the mass in Latin for his congregation, got into the bad habit of saying the word mumpsimus instead of sumpsimus . Sumpsimus means “we have taken”. Mumpsimus, on the other hand, doesn’t mean anything at all. Despite being corrected, so goes the story, the priest stubbornly stuck to his mistake. His masses were always conducted with the nonsense word mumpsimus , and he could not be talked out of it.  Now mumpsimus does have a meaning. It means someone who obstinately sticks to their opinion even after being shown that they are wrong.  It is a cute story in part because, at least to most of us, it doesn’t really matter. We’re people who pray in a language which isn’t our mother tongue. Even for native Hebrew speakers, the language of prayer...
Read more